Module VIII: Longevity Medicine and Bio-Hacking CME Evaluation

I have been a practicing clinician for: *

Please indicate which of the following best describes your specialty: *

Please select the extent to which you agree/disagree that the activity supported the achievement of each learning objectives? *

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Review senescence and causes of aging	Review senescence and causes of aging - Strongly Disagree	Review senescence and causes of aging - Disagree	Review senescence and causes of aging - Neutral	Review senescence and causes of aging - Agree	Review senescence and causes of aging - Strongly Agree
Understand the role of Red-Ox medicine and clinical application	Understand the role of Red-Ox medicine and clinical application - Strongly Disagree	Understand the role of Red-Ox medicine and clinical application - Disagree	Understand the role of Red-Ox medicine and clinical application - Neutral	Understand the role of Red-Ox medicine and clinical application - Agree	Understand the role of Red-Ox medicine and clinical application - Strongly Agree
Synthesize the role of various brain tools to optimize brain potential with qEEG, PEMF and other tools	Synthesize the role of various brain tools to optimize brain potential with qEEG, PEMF and other tools - Strongly Disagree	Synthesize the role of various brain tools to optimize brain potential with qEEG, PEMF and other tools - Disagree	Synthesize the role of various brain tools to optimize brain potential with qEEG, PEMF and other tools - Neutral	Synthesize the role of various brain tools to optimize brain potential with qEEG, PEMF and other tools - Agree	Synthesize the role of various brain tools to optimize brain potential with qEEG, PEMF and other tools - Strongly Agree

If you answered "Strongly Disagree" or "Disagree" please explain:

Please select the extent to which you agree/disagree that the activity achieved the following: *

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
The content was evidence-based	The content was evidence-based - Strongly Disagree	The content was evidence-based - Disagree	The content was evidence-based - Neutral	The content was evidence-based - Agree	The content was evidence-based - Strongly Agree
The educational material provided useful information for my practice	The educational material provided useful information for my practice - Strongly Disagree	The educational material provided useful information for my practice - Disagree	The educational material provided useful information for my practice - Neutral	The educational material provided useful information for my practice - Agree	The educational material provided useful information for my practice - Strongly Agree
The opportunities provided to assess my own learning were appropriate (e.g., questions before, during or after the activity)	The opportunities provided to assess my own learning were appropriate (e.g., questions before, during or after the activity) - Strongly Disagree	The opportunities provided to assess my own learning were appropriate (e.g., questions before, during or after the activity) - Disagree	The opportunities provided to assess my own learning were appropriate (e.g., questions before, during or after the activity) - Neutral	The opportunities provided to assess my own learning were appropriate (e.g., questions before, during or after the activity) - Agree	The opportunities provided to assess my own learning were appropriate (e.g., questions before, during or after the activity) - Strongly Agree

If you answered "Strongly Disagree" or "Disagree" please explain:

To what degree did/will this activity: *

	Significantly	Moderately	Minimally	Not at all
Increase your knowledge	Increase your knowledge - Significantly	Increase your knowledge - Moderately	Increase your knowledge - Minimally	Increase your knowledge - Not at all
Change your competence	Change your competence - Significantly	Change your competence - Moderately	Change your competence - Minimally	Change your competence - Not at all
Change your practice performance	Change your practice performance - Significantly	Change your practice performance - Moderately	Change your practice performance - Minimally	Change your practice performance - Not at all
Change patient care	Change patient care - Significantly	Change patient care - Moderately	Change patient care - Minimally	Change patient care - Not at all

Do you plan to implement & utilize the information you have received at this course? *

Yes

No

If you answered "No", please explain:

Was this activity free of commercial bias? *

Yes

No

If you answered "No", please explain:

Please rate the faculty *

	Excellent	Above Average	Average	Fair	Poor
Felice Gersh, MD	Felice Gersh, MD - Excellent	Felice Gersh, MD - Above Average	Felice Gersh, MD - Average	Felice Gersh, MD - Fair	Felice Gersh, MD - Poor
David Hagedorn, PhD	David Hagedorn, PhD - Excellent	David Hagedorn, PhD - Above Average	David Hagedorn, PhD - Average	David Hagedorn, PhD - Fair	David Hagedorn, PhD - Poor
Oscar Lopez, MD	Oscar Lopez, MD - Excellent	Oscar Lopez, MD - Above Average	Oscar Lopez, MD - Average	Oscar Lopez, MD - Fair	Oscar Lopez, MD - Poor
Rollin McCraty, PhD	Rollin McCraty, PhD - Excellent	Rollin McCraty, PhD - Above Average	Rollin McCraty, PhD - Average	Rollin McCraty, PhD - Fair	Rollin McCraty, PhD - Poor
Beatriz Palma-Zevallos, MD	Beatriz Palma-Zevallos, MD - Excellent	Beatriz Palma-Zevallos, MD - Above Average	Beatriz Palma-Zevallos, MD - Average	Beatriz Palma-Zevallos, MD - Fair	Beatriz Palma-Zevallos, MD - Poor
Robert Rowen, MD	Robert Rowen, MD - Excellent	Robert Rowen, MD - Above Average	Robert Rowen, MD - Average	Robert Rowen, MD - Fair	Robert Rowen, MD - Poor
Marvin Berman, PhD	Marvin Berman, PhD - Excellent	Marvin Berman, PhD - Above Average	Marvin Berman, PhD - Average	Marvin Berman, PhD - Fair	Marvin Berman, PhD - Poor
Michael Lustgarten, PhD	Michael Lustgarten, PhD - Excellent	Michael Lustgarten, PhD - Above Average	Michael Lustgarten, PhD - Average	Michael Lustgarten, PhD - Fair	Michael Lustgarten, PhD - Poor
James Watson, MD	James Watson, MD - Excellent	James Watson, MD - Above Average	James Watson, MD - Average	James Watson, MD - Fair	James Watson, MD - Poor
Dave Asprey	Dave Asprey - Excellent	Dave Asprey - Above Average	Dave Asprey - Average	Dave Asprey - Fair	Dave Asprey - Poor
Gregory Fahy, PhD	Gregory Fahy, PhD - Excellent	Gregory Fahy, PhD - Above Average	Gregory Fahy, PhD - Average	Gregory Fahy, PhD - Fair	Gregory Fahy, PhD - Poor
Rafael Gonzalez, PhD	Rafael Gonzalez, PhD - Excellent	Rafael Gonzalez, PhD - Above Average	Rafael Gonzalez, PhD - Average	Rafael Gonzalez, PhD - Fair	Rafael Gonzalez, PhD - Poor
Steven Horvath, PhD	Steven Horvath, PhD - Excellent	Steven Horvath, PhD - Above Average	Steven Horvath, PhD - Average	Steven Horvath, PhD - Fair	Steven Horvath, PhD - Poor
James LaValle, RPh, CCN	James LaValle, RPh, CCN - Excellent	James LaValle, RPh, CCN - Above Average	James LaValle, RPh, CCN - Average	James LaValle, RPh, CCN - Fair	James LaValle, RPh, CCN - Poor
Valter Longo, PhD	Valter Longo, PhD - Excellent	Valter Longo, PhD - Above Average	Valter Longo, PhD - Average	Valter Longo, PhD - Fair	Valter Longo, PhD - Poor
Sharon McQuillan, MD	Sharon McQuillan, MD - Excellent	Sharon McQuillan, MD - Above Average	Sharon McQuillan, MD - Average	Sharon McQuillan, MD - Fair	Sharon McQuillan, MD - Poor

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of this activity. (Optional)

Specific to your specialty, what other topics would be beneficial in your practice for future educational activities?

Specific to your specialty, what other topics would be beneficial in your practice for future educational activities? Other...

I prefer to receive CME through: *

I prefer to receive CME through: Other...

The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences